Dark room performance is good and it has good HDR capabilities. The Vizio has a much better local dimming that greatly enhances dark room performance. The Sony X900F is better than the Samsung Q6FN. See our recommendations for the best 4k TVs, the best smart TVs, and the best OLED TVs. The differences are marginal, though. If you find that it bothers you, you can set it to low as it cannot be turned off completely from the regular menu. I paid $999 on sale. For more information on how we review video games and other media/technology, please review our Review … Game mode must be on for VRR to work. Also im using Apple Tv 4k box on the q6f. I didn't even have to put in my wifi code. And it's light and slim, not as slim as LG but slim enough for me. Long story short I was told i’m Out of luck and i’m now a not so proud owner of a broken TV. Let me just say, once in my home, this TV picture is wonderful. Best results are with the picture mode set to Movie. I watch movies and see almost little to no light bleed on the blackbars when watching movies. If space is a concern, some people may prefer the simpler installation of the Q6FN with all of the inputs on the TV. The frequency response is about average. It has nice cable management planning. Here are the white balance and gamma pictures measured with 100% windows. I bought this TV to replace a 3D 55”, 240hz Samsung that I bought in 2013. LFE (low-frequency extension) is at 76Hz, which is decent. The overall amount of harmonic distortion is elevated, even at moderate volumes. The Samsung Q6FN and the LG SK9000 have different types of panels. I read lots of reviews and ratings which really just gave me information overload. Find low everyday prices and buy online for delivery or in-store pick-up. Samsung Q6FN vs Sony X900F Review (QN49Q6FN vs XBR49X900F, QN55Q6FN vs XBR55X900F, QN65Q6FN vs XBR65X900F, QN75Q6FN vs XBR75X900F, QN82Q6FN vs … For the difference in price I think the q6f is worth the difference if you can find it for $999 or cheaper. The Sony X900E is better than the Samsung Q6FN. You will be very satisfied with the performance, looks and ease of use. It supports a variable refresh rate when used with compatible hardware. Everyone seems to have an opinion between manufacturers, so I started to hone in on what they could offer for quality and price, size, 4K HDR, and LED versus QLED. The new technology works. The price was great for what you get. The RU8000, on the other hand, has a faster response time and supports a 1440p @ 60Hz resolution, making it better for gaming. I chose the 55” QLED because a tiny part of me thought that maybe 65” would be a bit large for my space, compared to the quality that would come with a QLED. You can barely see it in the Samsung. In the market, they both come with many screen sizes … To enable the black frame insertion feature on the Samsung Q6FN, set Auto Motion Plus to Custom, and set LED Clear Motion to On. The mu8000 is a fine panel, but the picture quality of the Q6F is on whole different level. The Vizio can also handle reflections better, and the image looks a little crisper due to the faster response time. In the end, it was between the 55" Q6 and the 55" LG OLED and I was going to make my decision based upon what I saw with my own eyes. Dark room performace seems to be better on the b7 vs q6f, and that's about it. That would have made our decision a bit easier. Samsung Q60R vs Q6FN Review - (QN49Q60R vs QN49Q6FN, QN55Q60R vs QN55Q6FN, QN65Q60R vs QN65Q6FN, QN75Q60R vs QN75Q6FN, QN82Q60R vs QN82Q6FN) The thin frame and body of the television will mean you'll be replacing this TV in no time due to damage. Fast-paced movement appears fluid with little motion blur thanks to the high response time, but there is some dirty screen effect and the center of the screen is a bit brighter than the rest. The distortion performance is mediocre. There are very few buttons, most of them open other menus on the TV. Just like most Samsung TVs, the contrast level is high. There was no temporary image retention on the 2018 Q6. Be the first to start a discussion about Samsung Q6FN/Q6/Q6F QLED 2018. The Q70R also has better reflection handling to minimize distraction if your room has many light sources. a 4k TV with great performance for a wide range of different usages. Motion is fluid with very little trail thanks to the fast response time. Rating 4.7 out of 5 stars with 654 reviews. I purchased this TV during the Presidents' Day sale at a remarkable sale price. The Samsung Q6 is able to overcome most glare in a bright room but has limited reflection handling due to the lack of an anti-reflective coating. The Samsung Q70/Q70R QLED is better than the Samsung Q6FN/Q6/Q6F QLED 2018. I wouldn’t recommend this TV or Best Buy. Upscaling of 720p content such as cable TV or older game consoles looks good. This became a conundrum given the QLED being more affordable, but a smaller screen size. Originally I was looking at the OLED Sony Bravio which has an incredible built-in speakers and stunning picture quality however the price point was quite a bit higher which ultimately is what swayed me towards this Sansung. Just like the rest of the 2018 Samsung QLEDs, it will display small highlights very well, and the screen remains uniformly bright throughout all the test window sizes. These results are in line with results from other QLEDs. The Samsung Q6F 55 is effective at removing Judder from 24p content from all sources, including when sent in a 60 fps signal from a cable box. I think the q6f color, brightness and sharp image is much better than the b7. I originally purchased another 4K HDR brand with AndroidTV, but returned it after only a few days because the navigation on the remote and user interface was so complicated. Good TV for HDR movies. These are two different types of TV, but most people will agree that the Samsung Q6FN is better than the LG SK8000 overall. The warehouse variant of the 2018 Q6F is known as the Q65FN. The Q6 QLED was $600 less, I didn't have to worry about image retention, and from my perspective both images were pretty much equivalent. At low input levels, the image appears slightly dark as white is missing luminosity. I do not notice and abnormally banding or small image defects on the q6f, it is a very clean looking picture, in light or dark enviroment.